• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Laine signs 2 year deal, 6.75 AAV

If Laine starts caring about hockey again, this could be a steal. On the other hand, if he plays like he did for most of last season (basically all of it other than November)...
 
Virtually identical to Panarin's 2-year deal ($6mil AAV) signed a few years ago. Panarin's had a 8.22 CH% while Laine's is 8.28%. Panarin arguably had slightly better stats to back that up with though. His deal brought him directly to UFA status as well while Laine will still have 2 more seasons of RFA eligiblity.
 
So of the big RFAs that have since signed:
Marner - 6 year term for the totality of his prime, semi-expensive today but cost controlled through expansion + start of new tv deal
Point - 3 years to try to shed Tyler Johnson's deal until Point re-ups for hopefully a long-term team friendly 12M
Tkachuk - 3 years, 9M QO which sets the mark for the Gaudreau negotiation at the same time
Laine - 2 years, leading to a protracted arbitration/trade me argument down the road
 
bustaheims said:
If Laine starts caring about hockey again, this could be a steal. On the other hand, if he plays like he did for most of last season (basically all of it other than November)...

It could be a steal for the next two years and an absolute kick in the nads in year 3 to 10 when he goes for broke after "caring about hockey again" for two seasons.
 
herman said:
So of the big RFAs that have since signed:
Marner - 6 year term for the totality of his prime, semi-expensive today but cost controlled through expansion + start of new tv deal
Point - 3 years to try to shed Tyler Johnson's deal until Point re-ups for hopefully a long-term team friendly 12M
Tkachuk - 3 years, 9M QO which sets the mark for the Gaudreau negotiation at the same time
Laine - 2 years, leading to a protracted arbitration/trade me argument down the road

There?s an article in the athletic today on this:

https://theathletic.com/1237089/2019/09/28/how-much-did-the-maple-leafs-overpay-on-their-big-3-rfa-deals-and-will-it-even-matter/

One perspective is the leafs are blessed having won the Matthews lottery, taking one of the best #4 draft picks in memory, and striking a home run on their #8 pick, which often just wind up as a 2nd or 3rd liner or worse.  That gave them the best trio of rookies in decades statistically.  A consequence is that the leafs, unlike any other team, found themselves in a situation where they had a historic group of rookies come up as RFAs at the same time. We had to pay a little more for that than others did when they had guys come up one at a time because collectively, they had more power.  But the benefit is we have a top-5 team. It?s a good place to be.
 
Back
Top